"Undermining my electoral viability since 2001."

A Moral Economy

Breaking away from Market Fundimentalism, embracing the concept of a Moral Economy:

With the construction of a moral economy as the frame, Reich's other stories fall into place. The "rot at the top" has never smelled so putrid; the decay comes from the obscenely wealthy who have abandoned real enterprise for paper manipulations that generate outlandish returns. The "mob at the gates" continues to be those committed to jihad against the West. But the Bush Administration's response to this threat has been completely self-defeating. We need, instead, greater international cooperation to combat terrorism and concerted efforts to build a moral economy at the global level. Creating a world in which children born in the slums of Cairo, Islamabad and Lagos have real opportunities for meaningful employment and political participation is the only way to isolate the jihadists.

The triumphant individuals in this narrative are people of different ethnicities, immigrants and native born, both women and men, gay and straight, rural, suburban and urban, for whom the doors of opportunity would be reopened by the project of building a moral economy. With such an economy, our nation would become a "benevolent community" in which each individual is able to reach his or her full potential.

To be sure, stories are not enough. We also need bold policy ideas that would implement the principles of a moral economy. But the stories have to come first, and those stories must connect us to our nation's richest traditions. The great popular movements of our nation's history--against the slave trade, for the abolition of slavery, for women's suffrage, for trade union rights, for restraints on the power of big business in the Progressive Era, and extending to the civil rights movement, the New Left and the environmental movement--can all be understood as efforts to align our economic and political institutions with our deepest moral commitments. We will be honoring their legacy when we present a vision of a moral economy as an alternative to the failed claims of Market Fundamentalism.

There are plenty of linguistic games to play around with -- like "Free Trade" vs. "Fair Trade" -- but the wind up is that progressives have a chance to rightfully take a position as the champions of real enterprise against corrupt croneys who seek to perpetuate an inequitable status quo.

Politically, this is what we're talking about when we say "It's the economy, stupid." It's not enough that people are having hard times (as they are outside the upper class). There has to be a narrative of why this is happening, and how things can be different.

Read More

Tags: 

Secrets

The State is keeping more secrets. Really, the opposite should be happening. Government should be opening up, bringing services, data and forums for public comment online.

Read More

Tags: 

Pimpin?

I know the Pimp is in the cultural zeitgeist, and what with Hustle and Flow's song winning an oscar, and being set in Memphis and all, it seems like ground zero for political pimpdom. But I have to say, neither of these sites is very pimpin'.

The site attacking Harold Ford Jr. went up first, and the Frist site is a mocking response, but I think Democrats are displaying their cultural tone-deafness when they say FancyFord.com portreys Congressman/Candidate Ford as a pimp.

It's attacking Ford for allegedly living well, and (semi covertly) for also being black at the same time. There's implicit racism in that charge, but it says something about the partisans on our side that the put two and two (upper class + black) together and get Pimp. Politics is about making waves, I know. But come on. Those sites just ain't pimpin'. This is pimpin'.

And anyway, Frist is more of a whore. Corporate, but still a whore.

Read More

Tags: 

Do the Time Warp

Got 30 minutes to burn? Watch the video here (link on the right hand side launches player) from about three and a half years ago. Warning: it might make you throw up a little bit in your mouth.

I watched this live on TV back then, and that's when it became clear to me that Bush was set on invading Iraq, and when I started actively thinking about what I could do to stop that. In retrospect, the propaganda is so blindingly obvious. Drones! Oi.

Read More

Tags: 

The Insurgency

FRONTLINE: the insurgency: watch the full program.

The Austrailian guy with the copyrights all over everything (Michael Ware) seems like a bit of a boaster, but given the situation for journalists over there it wasn't as though Frontline had a plethora of sources to pick from.

The report tries to be positive, and it would be great if Col. McMaster's point of view had been shared up and down the chain of command from day 1, but given recent events, I don't think we're going to get a happy ending. Even if we dodge the rumbling civil war for another year, the occupation can go on and on for a lot longer and still not work out. The British occupied/created Iraq over a period of 35 years, and they were left with nothing.

I honestly don't see how we can hope to do any better, especially given our occupation's lack of sustainablility. In large part because the war was concieved with a level of due dilligance and objectivity that rivals the planners behind pets.com, and in large part because it's simply a terrifically bad idea to go and invade countries that didn't invade you first, the strategic position we're in is a big-time loser. We're $250B in the hole so far, and the total human toll -- the effects of death, attrition, and future medical care for the wounded --- is going to push that much higher, two to four times higher, even if we could magically pull out right this second.

We simply cannot affort to keep this show running for much longer, and stubbornly pursuing the Tinkerbell Strategy (Clap louder! It'll work out!) is fucking ignorant, not to mention cruel. It's not as morally monsterous as when palace-dwelling generals in Europe fed millions into the trench-war meat grinder in WWI, but it's just about as stupid.

We should be looking at how to bring our occupation of Iraq -- and I would argue the majority of our military presence in the entire region -- to an end. It's going to happen. Empire isn't sustainable over time, and it's not really even the right idea to pursue. The question is whether we redeploy on our own terms or whether we continue burning our future prospects in pursuit of some spectre of Pax Americana.

Read More

Tags: 

Oh My

When arming people for civil war, America strives for balance. If this is an accurate description of our strategy at the moment, we're in for more bad news.

Read More

Tags: 

Hoaxy Conspires

Heard from some folks at the Oscars that there's an email/forward going around claiming an 9/11 connection with verse 9:11 in the Koran. I want you to just take s guess whether or not it's true.

The answer.

Come on, people. Looking for conspiracies is a fundimentally disempowering way to analyze reality. It's a cop-out. Yeah, the odds are stacked; but that's not exactly a fucking secret, now is it?

And also, while we're at it, although it's clear that there are some unanswered questions about what exactly happened on 9/11, the idea that those events were part of a deliberate plan which was orchestrated by the power-elite of this country is one without a factual basis. Making that accusation, even by inference, without some kind of real evidence is, in my opinion, the height of counterproductivity.

I understand the allure of drama and intrigue (fnord) but this isn't an ok thing to jerk around about. Even Oliver Stone realizes that, you dig?

So give the conspiracy a rest. If you need something to do, get to work on that biodesil algae pond.

Read More

Tags: 

SexBlogging

The debate about Abortion is really about sex, generally. Especially when a core part of the anti-choice argument basically goes, "Don't want a baby? Close your legs, slut."

Read More

Tags: 

Net Freedom Heating Up

Net Freedom Now

This is important stuff. I've previously linked to Net Freedom Now, which has some good background, but doesn't necessarily seem all that active. Common Cause has been a little iffy when it comes to the regulation of political blogging, but it looks like they're trying to make up for it by taking a stand here.

Check it out, get informed, spread the word. I'll be monitoring this and ramping things up.

Read More

Tags: 

Lawful

Don't know why, but this just hit me as I whipped up my morning coffee.

There's a kind of ying-yang of rule-following and rule-breaking etched into the American soul. We have deep traditions and ingraned respect for both the straight-shooter and the outlaw. There's a good and bad side to both these traditions. Allow me to break it down:

You have good rule-breakers, from the original Revolutionary roots of the nation through Thereau and the latter-day heroes of civil disobedience. You have the essentially healthy mistrust of authority. You have the honesty of the outlaw, those who understand that living by your own law requires a higher standard. Clearly, this is where my heart lies.

And then you have the bad rule-breakers: criminals, thugs, and abusers of power. You have Sen. George McCarthy and a host of lesser figures (like Dick Cheney) who build their position in life by breaking the rules and breaking others down in doing so. These people are few and far between, but they're really destructive.

On the flip side, you have the good rule-followers. You've got a whole mess of right-thinking preachers, FDR, an honest sherrif, and all the other the collected stars of Law and Order. You've got the constitution and it's fans, Young Ralph Nader, and even some members of the Press. These folks are the bedrock of a stable society.

Finally, you have the bad rule-followers. These folks are the worst in my opinion. They break down into two sub-camps: people who are blindly authoritarian (the loyal base for the Daddy State) and people who use legalistic means to achieve what are ultimately immoral ends. For instance -- just gonna throw this out there -- using the Supreme Court to stop people from counting votes.

The problem we face right now is we have a bunch of bad people in positions of power, and a bunch of reflexively pro-authority people all around them. It's like when Nixon won by thundering on that the US was a country of Law and Order, while simultaniously ordering the illegal/inhumane bombing of Cambodia and using the FBI to compile damaging information about those he deemed his "enemies" here in the US. That he eventually went down for a botched burglery is tragicomic.

At some point soon there should be a backlash. I for one can't wait.

Read More

Tags: 

Pages